[sumo] Effect of jungyo

[Charles Beauchamp]

For someone who keeps claiming to not want to bicker
argue etc you sure do nitpick quite a bit.  You said
something in your commentary that was fundamentally
wrong.  I called you on it.  You changed what you said
to something meaningless rendering any point you were
trying to make useless.  I had no misunderstanding at
all.  You simply communicated something that was
foolishly wrong.  No more no less.  Now grow up or
shut up already and move on.

--- Joshua Maciel <joshua.maciel at gmail.com> wrote:

> Honestly, you're just bickering for the sake of
> bickering at this point. If
> you really want to have an honest discussion, you'd
> do well to read that was
> written. I know you're saying that you've done this,
> but no matter how much
> you argue that you know what I said better than I
> do, you'll still be wrong.
> It's unfortunate I didn't write a treatise
> explaining every aspect to avoid
> confusion, but honestly, you're not worth the time.
> 
> Feel free to insult me further if you feel the need.
> I'm not going to argue
> about what I said/meant when I've already explained
> it sufficiently. I don't
> think others are so quick to fault me for your lack
> of reading
> comprehension.
> 
> - Josh
> _______________________________________________
> Sumo mailing list
> Sumo at webtrek.com
> http://www.webtrek.com/mailman/listinfo/sumo
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? 
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. 
http://tv.yahoo.com/